Follow
Share

My mom lived with me for 6 years. I did not charge for her care. She kept her social security check $1400/mo. She was functional but had (not diagnosed) early dementia. She had a checking and savings account with a substantial amount of money (estimated $275K combined). There are 4 siblings and one sibling is listed on the checking and one sibling is listed on the savings, the other sibling had total use of her 2013 Mercedes (no loan, paid for in cash) as if it was his own. The vehicle has a value of 13K today. The vehicle is still in my mom's name. He thinks the car should be his free and clear claiming it's been in his possession all of this time. The other siblings are more financially stable than me but did not want to take her in when she started to show health issues. Mom passed away in August 2021. As a family, we decided to wait until the end of the year to make sure all of her bills were in and could be paid before distributing the money in her accounts. We are at the point where we are ready to divide her accounts. I ask them if I could have an additional $20K for taking care of her all of this time with no help from them and the fact that I did not take her checks or receive any restitution for her care. This allowed her to stay out of the nursing home and attributed to the increased balance in the checking and savings account. I was told flat out NO. Can I sue her estate or send a bill for providing care-giver services for the last 6 years? I live in Maryland and one sibling lives in Maryland. The other two are in Texas and Washington State. Thank you for feedback.

This question has been closed for answers. Ask a New Question.
No, I don't think that you can sue. The only time to get paid for care is with contract and at the time the care is given, whether you expect payment from the recipient of the care, their family, or the state. Once it is over and the recipient of the care is dead there is no way to get "payment". I am feeling relieved that they are providing anything given their names appear to be on accounts. I would enlist a trust and estate attorney at once and would apply to be the executor of what estate remains; if a brother already has done that then it is done. Take all documents and facts with you. Your own interests and your own questions require, in this instance, your own lawyer to guide you. This may only require a few hours of expert advice, but expert advice is what you should be counting on. With no documentation I think you are down to the goodwill of your bros, but I may well be wrong. See an attorney and best of luck to you.
Helpful Answer (6)
Report

At best you could go back three years, but I don't think you'll even get that without having had any agreement in writing.

You should be darned lucky the sibs are splitting the money equally, because the ones who are on her bank accounts are by law the owners of those accounts and don't have to split them with anyone. (Let's hope they don't know that.)

Also, you should wait until a final 2021 tax return is filed for your mom before splitting the money. If any taxes are owed, good luck getting money back to pay them.
Helpful Answer (3)
Report

If you divide that $20K by six years' labour, the resulting wage is so insultingly low that I think you'll find it simply isn't worth another moment of your time, trouble or heartache.

Seriously - the quicker you drop it, or offer it up, or whatever else helps you eliminate this whole train of thought, the sooner you will recover from the emotional ordeal you've been through.

Did all of your siblings give you a flat no? - were they in agreement among themselves? And did they show their reasoning? I realise these questions contradict the advice I've suggested, but I also know from experience how hard it is to do that! Hugs to you.
Helpful Answer (3)
Report

She died intestate. There’s no will, so no preset determination as to what the distribution of her estate is to be carried out and who would be the executor, correct?

Normally for intestate, the heirs get an atty in the state & county she died in to establish lineal heirship…. It’s not necessarily difficult… it’s more a matter of finding out marital history, children born and doing a call out via publications for anyone to challenge the supposed heirs. And the atty does a accounting of the assets & claims against the estate then distribution to the heirs after claims dealt with. It’s all done according to probate law and takes anywhere from 6 mos to a year to suss out.

You do not mention attorneys or probate, so It sounds like this is not at all happening. If getting an atty to do a lineal heirship did not happen, here’s my guess at to what’s happening:
A Sibling was signatory and POD (pay on death) on the checking acct, so technically it’s theirs… it passed to them outside of probate. Another sibling was the same on the savings account. So none of that money in the checking or savings needs to be share at all. It’s theirs, they own it. That they are actually paying moms debts and want to divvy up what’s left is a nice gesture that they do not have to do. Again if they each are POD on those accounts, it’s theirs, they do not have to share.
Could this be it? If so, it’s not fair but they are sharing equally what’s left. This is the same point that MJ & Alva posted about.

The car is different if titled in only moms name. So if brother wants to get it into his name, he’s going to need a way legally to do this. If Maryland allows for a Muniment of Title to be done, he could do one. Muniment are a way to transfer real property (car, land, house) easily. Texas allows for Muniment & it runs abt $800. If the sibling in TX has the car in TX & a death certificate, I bet he could do one. Or he could just let the car continue as it is now…. he drives it, garages it and it stays in her name. He pays registration, insurance & maintenance and doesn’t bother to get title transferred. Folks do this all the time. 13K on a Benz is on the low side, bet it has a lot of mileage.

Perhaps other 2 would be willing to deducted 13k from car brothers final share? And split it 3 ways. Realize he could get an appraisal done that gets it even lower in value, if he wants to be a dick.

Dead or alive trying to be paid after the fact imo is near to impossible if there is no contract, no agreement. There was 6 years in which a contract or pattern of payment for caregiving could have been done. Nevertheless one could file a claim against an Estate and then the Executor can either accept it or ask you to provide documentation as to why it’s valid & if you have nothing it gets tossed out. But if probate is not opened, which is what it sounds like, there’s no probate opened / no Estate to file against.

If you insist on doing something, meet with a probate attorney who does litigation (most probate guys do not do litigation) to see if there is any possible way to file a claim at this point in time.
Helpful Answer (2)
Report

You could sit down and collect and document all financial information for the things you feel you're owed from the estate, such as room and board at reasonable local rates, and sue for that. My opinion is that you wouldn't win here. Or, take it to small claims where you could get up to 5k in most US jurisdictions. Again, my feeling is you won't win but you could try. Small claims filing is relatively cheap. And if sibs see you're serious about this they may consent to give you *something.* You're owed so much more, of course, but there was no contract for payment.

I would think the car is part of the estate if the title is in your mom's name. It should either be sold and that money put into the shared amount or sibling pays off what is due to the other beneficiaries.

It's a shame family caregivers -- specifically the sibling who steps up and gives years of care and hard work -- so often seem to get screwed when a LO passes.

It's no consolation I'm sure, but I hope your post and the replies serve as a helpful warning for other family caregivers. It's so very important to have a contract in place.
Helpful Answer (1)
Report

Perhaps asking for a general sum (possibly much less than entitled to) has worked against you here as it has no basis in fact.

If you can be more specific about all out of pocket expenses (with receipts), consumption of utilities (% share divided among residents) from bills, damages and depreciation arising from care, at least you can realise the costs absorbed (as opposed to receiving a legacy).

When classified as reinstatement of your loss, this may be looked upon more favourably as, while you may not be entitled to a windfall, you should not be financially impacted without reimbursement.

If still dismissed by siblings, presenting such a case may carry more weight in any claim you wish to pursue legally, BEFORE the estate is settled.
Helpful Answer (1)
Report

We live in a litigious country. You can sue for almost anything. Visit your attorney. You are in the right. Sometimes that matters.
Helpful Answer (0)
Report

This question has been closed for answers. Ask a New Question.
Ask a Question
Subscribe to
Our Newsletter